Anti-Gay Wedding Website Ruling Based on FRAUD
Reporter discovers man named in Anti-Gay Wedding Website Ruling by the United States Supreme Court is not gay and didn’t request a wedding website
Reports say the Anti-Gay Wedding Website Ruling by the United States Supreme Court was fraudulent because the man named in 303 Creative case is not gay and didn’t request a wedding website. Melissa Gira Grant, staff writer for The New Republic, talks about her interview with the person supposedly at the heart of the 303 Creative v. Elenis case and her reporting that suggests there is no basis in reality for the case that has become the vehicle for the conservative Supreme Court to allow discrimination against LGBTQ people.
This “ruling” sets the stage for Restaurants or any type of business you can think of to refuse service to anyone for ANY reason.
IMO, the man who was wrongly accused of being gay should sue the woman who brought the case, and since it was based on fraud, sue to make the Supreme Court reverse their decision.
Reporter discovers man named in 303 Creative case is not gay and did request a wedding website
Michael Steele is joined by Melissa Gira Grant, writer for The New Republic and Neal Katyal, former Acting Solicitor General during the Obama administration who argued and won a major win for voting rights in the landmark Moore v. Harper case this week. Grant discusses her reporting that the man named in Supreme Court’s 303 Creative ruling didn’t actually request a wedding website and other bizarre details that raise questions about the case’s legitimacy. “This was built on a fiction. It was based on an injury that has never happened,” Grant explains. Katyal discusses the harmful implications of arguing hypothetical cases. “It’s a tragedy that they didn’t find this information before,” Katyal says. “There is a procedure to get this case stricken from the books…Otherwise, the Supreme Court can dragged into all sorts of controversies that aren’t legal cases but just imaginary fights between people and that’s not what the court is about.”
This is proof of what an incompetent, radical-right-wing political HACK establishment the Supreme Court has become
GOP confronted over ‘straights only’ discrimination, after Scotus echoes parts of Jim Crow
Over 400 anti-LGBTQ bills have been introduced this year. It comes as the Supreme Court backtracks on decades of precedent in a new discrimination ruling. Chasten Buttigieg joins MSNBC Chief Legal Correspondent Ari Melber on “The Beat” to discuss protecting LGBTQ rights
‘Politicians in Robes’: How the right-wing Supreme Court is mounting a power grab
